Disciplinary hearings: some schools are flouting the rules
Schools do not have discretion in dealing with learners who contravene the code of conduct
Schools are increasingly flouting correct procedures when disciplining learners, says the writer. Graphic: Lisa Nelson
Picture yourself as a parent who receives a call from your child’s school. You are told that your child has contravened the school’s code of conduct and you must go to the school immediately.
When you arrive, you and your child are called into the office to meet the school principal and school governing body chairperson. The chairperson informs you that your child has been found guilty of contravening the school’s code of conduct and will be suspended for five days. Neither you nor your child have been given a chance to speak.
This is one of the many sorts of cases that the Equal Education Law Centre has had to deal with.
A growing number of public schools are not following the correct procedures when disciplining learners.
Some schools seem to be under the impression that they are autonomous organisations with complete discretion on how they deal with learners who contravene the school’s code of conduct. This is not true.
The South African Schools Act and the regulations are quite clear regarding the procedures to follow in respect of search and seizure, drug testing, suspension and expulsion, as well as the disciplinary process.
The Act provides that a governing body may — on reasonable grounds and as a precautionary measure — suspend a learner who is suspected of serious misconduct from attending school. But such suspension may only be enforced after the learner has been granted a reasonable opportunity to make representations in relation to such suspension.
The school must initiate disciplinary proceedings against a learner through a written notice. The notice must set out the charges that the learner is accused of, with some of the facts surrounding the allegations. The letter must say whether the learner has been placed on temporary suspension or not, and how long the suspension will be. The maximum is seven days. The notice must also state the date and time of the disciplinary hearing, including the learner’s right to explain their case, call witnesses and be represented.
A governing body must conduct disciplinary proceedings against the learner within seven school days of such a suspension. If disciplinary proceedings are not conducted within seven school days, the governing body needs to obtain approval from the head of the provincial education department to continue the learner’s suspension.
It is also important to note that a governing body does not have the power to expel a learner from school. The governing body may only recommend to the Head of Department to expel a learner from the school. The Head of Department needs to decide and confirm whether or not to expel a learner within 14 days of receiving the recommendation.
Where disciplinary proceedings are conducted, a learner must be allowed to make representations or present their case before a decision is made on a suitable sanction.
The learner has a right to request documents (evidence), lead evidence and call and question witnesses. The learner has a right to be represented at the hearing by parents or by any representative chosen by the parents.
Where suspension is imposed on a learner, the learner’s right to education does not pause and academic support must still be provided to the learner by the school throughout the period of suspension.
Despite these clear obligations, schools still take it upon themselves to bypass procedure. Through our cases, we have observed that often, “problem children” do not have their right to a fair disciplinary hearing recognised.
Yes, a learner is required to follow the rules and to not breach the code of conduct. That goes without saying. However, there are rules which govern schools and school governing bodies too. What example do they set by requiring learners to abide by the rules when they themselves do not have due regard to the laws which govern them?
Perhaps some learners lack discipline and may continuously breach a school’s code of conduct. But due process must be followed to ensure that learners’ rights are safeguarded and that their best interests are considered, throughout the disciplinary process.
Every parent wants their child to be treated fairly, whether they contravene a school’s code of conduct or not, and even if the child confesses to wrongdoing.
Views expressed are not necessarily those of GroundUp.
Next: Video: Africa’s first LGBTQ+ shelter needs help to gear up for winter
Previous: Residents of Kirkwood join farm workers to shut down Eastern Cape town
Letters
Dear Editor
We have a similar problem. The child stays with the grandmother because her mother has been in and out of jail and her father was on drugs and now he had a stroke. One day she carried a small knife to school and took it out to show her friends. The child did not threaten anyone using the knife. However, when the teacher saw that, she felt intimidated by this. The teacher then called the police and laid a case against the child but the investigation officer could not find anything against the child.
A few months before, the same teacher said the child was on drugs without taking a drug test. The teacher finds it hard to accept that the reason why this child has a bad attitude is because her mother is not in her life. The principal has refused the child to attend school. He made it clear he or the teachers would lay another case if the child came back. But what are they doing to assist this child? We got her to see the social workers to help her.
© 2022 GroundUp. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You may republish this article, so long as you credit the authors and GroundUp, and do not change the text. Please include a link back to the original article.
We put an invisible pixel in the article so that we can count traffic to republishers. All analytics tools are solely on our servers. We do not give our logs to any third party. Logs are deleted after two weeks. We do not use any IP address identifying information except to count regional traffic. We are solely interested in counting hits, not tracking users. If you republish, please do not delete the invisible pixel.