Mowbray police assault: no names and no consequences
Victim has left work out of fear
- On 7 November police officers assaulted Juma Igiranieza at his work in Mowbray, Cape Town. The incident was caught on CCTV.
- A few weeks later the police minister, in response to a question on the incident, stated: “We will try to move fast.”
- Nearly three months later, the names of the officers involved have not been published and it’s unclear if any action has been taken against them.
The barber who was assaulted by police officers in Mowbray, Cape Town, last year has left his place of work because he fears being assaulted again. And yet, nearly three months later the South African Police Service (SAPS) and the Independent Police Investigative Directorate (IPID), remain mum on the outcome and identities of the officers who carried out the assault.
Barber, Juma Igiranieza, was assaulted on 7 November by SAPS members during a raid at his workplace, Perfect Touch Boutique and Salon.
GroundUp published CCTV footage on 10 November showing several police, one in plain clothes, carrying out the assault. In the footage, at least two officers participate directly in the assault and none of the other police appear concerned by it. The officers unleash a barrage of punches on Igiranieza, strike him repeatedly with a wooden device, and smother him with plastic.
The officers were allegedly looking for Igiranieza’s boss whom they accused of selling drugs. Igiranieza was taken to Groote Schuur Hospital for treatment following the assault.
The officers are members of the SAPS Special Provincial Task Unit called Operation Restoration (RETO). The charges being investigated against them are attempted murder, torture and assault.
Asked whether the officers had been identified, whether they had been charged and if they had faced any consequences, IPID spokesperson, Robbie Raburabu referred GroundUp to SAPS, saying: “The information you are looking for would not be provided by IPID but rather SAPS. Issues of discipline that are only dealt with by the employer.”
But when we went to SAPS, spokesperson FC Van Wyk sent us back to IPID, saying “Kindly be informed that the circumstances surrounding the incident cited in your enquiry are now the subject of an investigation by IPID. You are advised to refer your enquiry to the spokesperson of the mentioned department for a response.”
At a meeting of the South African National Editors Forum a few weeks after the incident Minister of Police Bheki Cele stated: “I am told that IPID is working on this particular case and many others and will make recommendations. We will try to move fast.”
“Complete travesty”
On Monday, the Western Cape Department of Police Oversight and Community Safety slammed IPID’s report for the second quarter of the 2023/24 financial year. The report shows that in the Western Cape, from July to September 2023, 196 cases were registered with IPID for investigation. Of the 1,276 cases countrywide, the Western Cape had the second highest behind Gauteng.
The 196 cases included 146 assault cases.
Reagan Allen, Western Cape police minister, said: “The high number of cases is deeply worrying, and quite frankly a disgrace. It suggests that there is an unacceptable level of ill-discipline within the ranks of SAPS that requires urgent attention. It’s a complete travesty that the very service that should be protecting all of us, while upholding the law, have allegedly made themselves guilty of committing crime.”
If anyone has credible information identifying the officers involved in the assault, please let us know via email: info@groundup.org.za. Your confidentiality is assured.
Video of the assault
Next: Hundreds evicted from buildings in Cape Town city centre
Previous: Judge Makhubele finally gives evidence in her conduct Tribunal
Letters
© 2024 GroundUp. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You may republish this article, so long as you credit the authors and GroundUp, and do not change the text. Please include a link back to the original article.
We put an invisible pixel in the article so that we can count traffic to republishers. All analytics tools are solely on our servers. We do not give our logs to any third party. Logs are deleted after two weeks. We do not use any IP address identifying information except to count regional traffic. We are solely interested in counting hits, not tracking users. If you republish, please do not delete the invisible pixel.