The student activist who gaslit workers and cost them their jobs
31 sacked security guards have asked UCT for forgiveness after being misled by Sibusiso Mpendulo
Sibusiso Mpendulo, fair use from his Facebook page.
- An error in this article was corrected after publication. Please see the correction note at the end.
- 31 security guards were fired in June after they disrupted UCT exams in an attempt to get insourced by the university.
- These guards had, for years, been misled by a student activist, Sibusiso Mpendulo, who pretended to be a lawyer.
- Mpendulo misrepresented a court order and took thousands of rands from the security guards, before they realised they had been gaslit.
- Now the guards have apologised to UCT, and asked to be insourced.
In July this year, 31 security guards that disturbed a June exam at the University of Cape Town (UCT) were fired by the security company that employed them. But behind this action, footage of which was widely shared on social media, is a story of outrageous deception.
The guards, who worked for a security company contracted by UCT and were asking to be insourced by the university, were following the advice of a former student activist Sibusiso Mpendulo, 37. Now, they are asking this university to forgive them and to be insourced, saying that they were deceived.
Worker leader Amos Qwabi said he and 30 other security guards were misled and manipulated for years by Mpendulo, who claimed to be a lawyer, took thousands of rands from them, gave them fabricated court order papers and repeatedly lied to them, and ultimately led them into a ruinous strike that led to them losing their jobs.
Earlier this year, desperate after losing their jobs because they followed Mpendulo’s advice, the workers approached the People’s Law team for assistance. The People’s Law team helped them discover the staggering extent of Mpendulo’s fraud and manipulation.
Now the workers are asking the university to forgive them for the disruption, and for making the mistake of placing their trust in Mpendulo.
Asking to be insourced
Qwabi told GroundUp that this group of security guards have had a long struggle to be recognised as university employees, dating back to 2015, when the #FeesMustFall protests took hold at the campus. Some have guarded the university for over a decade.
At the time, one of the major demands of the protests was that university workers, including security guards, should be insourced.
In June 2016, then Vice-Chancellor Max Price announced that UCT would welcome about 1,000 insourced employees in July 2016. But about 50 guards who patrolled the university campus and who worked for Securitas and the Groote Schuur Community Improvement District (GSCID) were not among those hired.
Qwabi told GroundUp that they applied twice to be insourced, in 2016 and again in 2019, but did not succeed. He said that UCT did not explain to them why their applications failed.
“All we want is to be insourced so we can receive the same benefits enjoyed by other workers who are working for UCT.” He said they do the same job but earn much less. The insourced workers also get benefits like medical aid.
Meeting Mpendulo
Then in 2019, the group of guards met Mpendulo at a protest. They were enticed by his activist credentials. He offered to assist the workers.
“He told us that he is a lawyer and assured us that we will win this case against UCT,” he said.
Mpendulo has a bit of a record at UCT. In 2016, GroundUp reported on a “mini-protest” by Mpendulo and his “bodyguard”, in which he blocked an on-ramp to the university in a protest for workers to be insourced. Mpendulo kept on engaging in a number of disruptions, including a shutdown of the library in 2017.
Qwabi said at first Mpendulo told them that he would take their matter to the CCMA.
“I don’t know what happened at the CCMA since Mpendulo used to attend meetings alone,” he said. Then he said he was taking the matter to the Western Cape High Court.
“The process took long but we trusted him. He would go alone to court. We didn’t have a problem with that as we believed that he was helping us,” he said.
Mpendulo would meet with the guards, and tell them that he was acting for them in court. He “went to court” at least four times in 2019, and a number of times in later years. Each time, he would take R100 from each of the 31 workers.
In 2020, Covid meant that the case quietened. But Qwabi said Mpendulo came back in 2021, saying he was taking the matter back to the Western Cape High Court.
Then early this year he came to the workers with outstanding news – the workers had won the case and now UCT had no other option than to hire them.
A ruinous strike
In a 20 September letter written by the security workers to UCT, they asked the university staff, management and students to forgive them for the disruption they caused in May when they engaged in a strike action to be insourced by UCT.
Mpendulo came to the workers in May saying that the university was not complying with a court order against them, and that he had a plan to get the university to comply with the order and insource them.
After a meeting, Mpendulo told the workers to follow him into the examination halls as he disrupted the June university exams.
The disruption was widely covered in the news at the time. But reports did not get to the bottom of the story.
In this video, Mpendulo can be seen throwing papers around. He is incorrectly identified as a member of the Economic Freedom Fighters’ Student Command, and the guards are ambling down the aisles. They did not throw papers about.
Securitas and GSCID, the workers’ employers, called them in for disciplinary hearings after the unlawful strike.
Mpendulo’s advice to the worker was that they should not attend the hearings, saying that they had a right to embark on a strike.
They listened to him. The workers were sacked.
Mpendulo was later arrested for trespassing and malicious damage to property but charges were dismissed in court.
The misrepresented court order
Mpendulo did not deny this when called by GroundUp. He said that he has a court order but that UCT is refusing to implement it. He said he has since taken the matter to the Hawks.
This is Mpendulo’s Facebook post from July this year, trumpeting the court order:
Source: Sibusiso Mpendulo’s Facebook page, fair use.
His statement makes no sense: he cannot have “exclusive access” to a public document.
We originally reported that the court order was forged. This was because the order was not available in court records, either as a hard copy or online, it’s wording is unusual, it’s dated 2022 when it was issued in 2020, the only person who appeared to have it was Mpendulo and the issuing judge had no recollection of it. But this was an error on our part. We have since learnt that it likely is a real order, but Mpendulo has misrepresented it. It is nothing more than a perfunctory order referring the case for oral evidence.
Representing it as a “victory” and stating that “UCT loses a billion rand case” is fantasy.
“He messed up our lives”
Qwabi said Mpendulo brought nothing but more trouble into their lives after they trusted him. UCT failed them after they worked to keep the university and its people safe for years, said Qwabi, but Mpendulo made things much worse.
Qwabi said this fight made them targets at work. As a result, he was no longer happy and resigned earlier this year. But he continued supporting the motion that he and his colleagues should be insourced.
Qwabi said that when Mpendulo showed them the “court order” they were “so happy”. He said: “We didn’t even know that they were fake until recently. By then all the striking workers were out of their jobs.”
“We believed him but he messed up our lives,” said Qwabi.
Mpendulo and the “Hawks”
Mpendulo insists that the Hawks are investigating UCT for not following the court order. He would not give GroundUp the case number, and he threatened to report GroundUp to the Hawks if we “saved” the order.
But things get curious here.
Qwabi said that, after Mpendulo told the workers that he had taken the matter to the Hawks, he received a call from a detective by the name of “Tsiya” who asked to meet him in Cape Town Central police station for a statement. Qwabi told GroundUp that he met Tsiya and another man in an office at the police station who claimed that they were from the Hawks. Mpendulo told us the same story.
Since his statement was taken Qwabi has not received any feedback from Tsiya. “I called him a few weeks ago. He said he will update me in November when he is back in Cape Town,” he said.
GroundUp contacted detective “Tsiya”, who said he works for the Hawks and that he is aware of the case. When we asked what exactly he was investigating, he said he was busy in court and he dropped the call.
Help needed
Qwabi told GroundUp that Mpendulo went quiet after the workers lost their jobs. UCT was not insourcing them, per the “order”. They realised something was very wrong.
Desperate, they approached the People’s Law team, a Cape Town law advice clinic based at Bertha House. Through People’s Law, they found out that the papers were forged, and that they had been grossly misadvised.
“We had a meeting with the People’s Law and Mpendulo was part of it. When he was asked about the forged court order he got angry and marched out shouting. He told us that we must choose between the People’s Law team and him. He made this whole thing about him, not about us. Since then he dropped us,” he said.
Qwabi said People’s Law helped the workers uncover their deception, and helped them write to the university. They have petitioned UCT to reinstate and insource the striking UCT security guards by the end of October.
Mpendulo speaks
Responding to the allegations, Mpendulo said there are “unions” who are bought by UCT and they are trying to destabilise them. He said these “unions” are using his court papers he posted on his Facebook page and what they are doing is not right. He has reported them to the Hawks, who, he says, are investigating the UCT case against the dismissed workers.
Questions sent to the Hawks and UCT were not answered by time of publication, but answers will be added as they arrive.
The original version of the article incorrectly stated that the court order was a forgery.
This was because the order was not available in court records, it’s wording is unusual, it’s dated 2022 when it was issued in 2020, the only person who appeared to have it was Mpendulo and the issuing judge had no recollection of it.
Nevertheless Mpendulo has misrepresented it as a victory, claiming that "UCT loses billion rand court case". It is not a victory. It's a perfunctory order referring a case for oral evidence.
Support independent journalism
Donate using Payfast
Don't miss out on the latest news
We respect your privacy, and promise we won't spam you.
Next: There’s nothing here to vandalise, Dunoon residents tell officials on anti-vandalism drive
Previous: Municipalities must play their role in early childhood development
© 2022 GroundUp. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You may republish this article, so long as you credit the authors and GroundUp, and do not change the text. Please include a link back to the original article.
We put an invisible pixel in the article so that we can count traffic to republishers. All analytics tools are solely on our servers. We do not give our logs to any third party. Logs are deleted after two weeks. We do not use any IP address identifying information except to count regional traffic. We are solely interested in counting hits, not tracking users. If you republish, please do not delete the invisible pixel.