Who will be our next Public Protector? Here are the candidates

At least one may face conflicts of interest, a Corruption Watch study shows

| By and

The previous two Public Protectors, Thuli Madonsela (photo: CreamerMedia, CC BY 3.0) and Busiswe Mkhwebane (photo: ENCA, CC BY 3.0). (Advocate Kholeka Gcaleka is currently the acting Public Protector.) Who will succeed them?

The shortlist of Public Protector candidates has been announced by Parliament. One of the candidates for the position of Public Protector does not appear to meet the minimum requirements for the position, and another is the director of several companies and might face conflicts of interest, a study by Corruption Watch has shown.

The eight shortlisted candidates are: Advocate Kholeka Gcaleka, Advocate Oliver Josie, Magistrate Johannah Ledwaba, Muvhango Lukhaimane, Advocate Lynn Marais, Professor Boitumelo Mmusinyane, Advocate Tommy Ntsewa and Advocate Tseliso Thipanyane.

The longlist had 38 candidates on it. Here are Corruption Watch’s findings relating to the eight candidates who made the shortlist.

Advocate Kholeka Gcaleka

CV: Adv NK Gcaleka

Gcaleka is currently the acting Public Protector after serving as the Deputy Public Protector. She holds a Bachelor of Laws (LL.B) degree from University of KwaZulu-Natal, a Masters in Cyber Security Governance degree, and a Masters in Laws (LL.M) degree from the University of Johannesburg. She has previously worked as a state advocate and Senior Deputy Director for the National Prosecuting Authority. Additionally, she has served as a special advisor to several ANC executive ministers in both the Zuma and Ramaphosa administrations. In accordance with Section 1A of the Public Protector Act 23 of 1994, Gcaleka meets the basic requirements for the position of Public Protector.

In 2010, Gcaleka was quoted as saying that there should be no concern around the then National Director of Public Prosecutions, Menzi Simelane’s plan to close the Specialised Commercial Crime Unit and Asset Forfeiture Unit, among others. This raised controversy as she was the chairperson of the Society of State Advocates at the time, and her comments caused two senior state attorneys to resign.

In 2011, Gcaleka was appointed as the state prosecutor in the high-profile murder case against Richard Mdluli. This also raised controversy, as she had been a prosecutor in the case against Glenn Agliotti, which was thrown out because the state had not brought a prima facie case of murder against the accused. In 2017, a witness in the Richard Mdluli case alleged that Advocate Gcaleka had tried to coerce him into implicating Mdluli as a guilty party. It was also alleged that the recording of the meeting between the witness and the advocate was tampered with by the prosecution team.

In 2017, when Malusi Gigaba was appointed by then President Jacob Zuma to the position of Minister of Finance, Gcaleka was appointed as his legal advisor. This was a controversial appointment due to her 2010 comments of support for the restructuring of the criminal justice system. Also in 2017, senior treasury officials stated that the Treasury had been “captured”, citing among other things, that during a forensic audit by then Director-General Dondo Mogajane, into Eskom’s coal contracts with a company that used to be owned by the Gupta family and Duduzane Zuma, documents that should have been seen by Mogajane first were sent to then Gigaba’s advisors first, including Gcaleka.

Advocate Oliver Josie

CV: Adv O Josie

Josie recently resigned from his position as chief operating officer of the Department of Trade, Industry, and Competition’s Competition Tribunal and currently serves as a chairperson on the Department of Water and Sanitation’s Audit and Risk Committee. Josie has previously worked in executive-level legal positions within the NPA, SAPS, Standard Bank Group, City of Cape Town, and Department of Economic Development. He holds a Bachelor of Politics, an LL.B and B.Proc. degrees from the University of South Africa. Additionally, Josie has Masters degrees in Law and Business Leadership from University of South Africa. Josie meets the basic requirements for the position of Public Protector.

Magistrate Johannah Ledwaba

CV: Ms JK Ledwaba

Ledwaba is currently a magistrate and has a Bachelor of Laws and B.Iuris degrees from Vista University. She received additional legal training at the Pretoria Law School. Before becoming a magistrate, Ledwaba worked primarily as a prosecutor and state advocate for the NPA, most recently with the Asset Forfeiture Unit. Ledwaba meets the basic requirements for the position of Public Protector.

Muvhango Lukhaimane

CV: Ms M Lukhaimane

Lukahimane currently serves as an acting judge at the Gauteng High Court and has occupied the position of Pension Funds Adjudicator since 2013. Her qualifications include a B.Iuris, LL.M in Constitutional (Labour Law), Postgraduate Diploma in Management Studies, Postgraduate Diploma in Financial Planning, and a Master of Business Administration. In accordance with Section 1A of the Public Protector Act 23 of 1994, Lukhaimane meets the basic requirements for the position of Public Protector, when considering her experience in public administration.

Lukhaimane was also a front-runner in the 2016 Public Protector process. She interviewed very well in 2016. However the one concern which was raised in 2016 was her time in intelligence services.

Advocate Lynn Marais

CV: Adv L Marais

Marais has an extensive career in the legal field, including experience as an Advocate, Acting Magistrate, and various roles in Legal Aid South Africa and other legal practices. Marais meets the basic requirements for the position of Public Protector, when her cumulative experience in the administration of justice and practicing as an advocate is taken into consideration.

Professor Boitumelo Mmusinyane

CV: Prof B Mmusinyane

Mmusinyane holds an LL.D on Comparative Right to Adequate Housing, a Diploma in Human Rights, an LL.M with specialisation in Human Rights, and an LL.B. He has held various roles, including deputy director in the Faculty of Law undergraduate studies, senior lecturer in private law, and Investigator at the Office of the Public Protector. Based on our assessment of the candidate’s CV, we conclude that Mmusinyane does not hold the necessary experience as required in Section 1A of the Public Protector Act 23 of 1994, in order to be considered for the position of Public Protector. This may be due to an omission on his CV.

UPDATE: An updated CV for Professor Mmusinyane has been provided since publication of this article, and he does meet the requirements for the position set out in the act.

Advocate Tommy Ntsewa

CV: Adv KTT Ntsewa

Ntsewa is a self-employed advocate specialising in the legal areas of corporate governance, personal injury, contract, labour, corporate, mining, criminal, family, constitutional, and administrative law. He previously served as legal advisor to the Minister of Co-Operative Governance and Traditional Development and the Limpopo Premier’s office. He holds LL.B. and B.Iuris degrees from University of Lausanne. In accordance with Section 1A of the Public Protector Act 23 of 1994, Ntsewa meets the basic requirements for the position of Public Protector.

In 2009, the Chairpersons Association demanded that Ntsewa step down from his position as Chairman of the South African Geographical Names Council regarding a dispute on the renaming of an area.

Ntsewa is an active director of Mohlodi Holdings, Etlang Media and Ventramax Trading. If appointed, he may face a conflict of interest. During the vetting and interview process it is therefore important to determine what business activities are these companies involved in. Do these businesses do any business with the state? Does he have an active role in running them and if appointed as the Public Protector, would he resign from these companies?

Advocate Tseliso Thipanyane

CV: Adv TS Thipanyane

Thipanyane holds an LL.M in International Human Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal Justice and Administrative Law from the University of the Western Cape, and another LL.M in Corporate Law from the University of Johannesburg. He has occupied various senior positions in Chapter 9 bodies, such as the South African Human Rights Commission, and the Commission for the Promotion and Protection of the Rights of Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Communities. In 2017, Thipanyane was appointed as the CEO of the SAHRC and served a five-year term. He is currently the chairperson of the Southern African Institute for Responsive and Accountable Governance, as well as the chief director for coordination in the Office of the Secretary General of the Chief Justice. Thipanyane meets the basic requirements for the position of Public Protector.

According to the chairperson of the Ad Hoc Committee to nominate a person for appointment as public protector, Cyril Xaba, the next stage in the appointment process is a two-week screening from 1 to 18 August. During this selection phase, all shortlisted candidates will undergo suitability screening, reference checks, and qualifications verification. Following this, interviews will be conducted, and the committee will discuss the candidates. The committee aims to present its findings to the National Assembly by 31 August 2023.

Pillay is Head: Stakeholder Relations and Campaigns at Corruption Watch and Pearson is Project Specialist at Corruption Watch.

Views expressed are not necessarily those of GroundUp.

Update on 2023-08-01 14:39

Professor Mmusinyane's entry was updated to reflect that he does in fact meet the requirements of the act to be a Public Protector.

TOPICS:  Public Protector

Next:  Piketberg landowners block mining company’s access

Previous:  UK’s Jim Skea elected chair of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

© 2023 GroundUp. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

You may republish this article, so long as you credit the authors and GroundUp, and do not change the text. Please include a link back to the original article.

We put an invisible pixel in the article so that we can count traffic to republishers. All analytics tools are solely on our servers. We do not give our logs to any third party. Logs are deleted after two weeks. We do not use any IP address identifying information except to count regional traffic. We are solely interested in counting hits, not tracking users. If you republish, please do not delete the invisible pixel.