SIU takes aim at ballooning dodgy medical litigation that is costing the government billions
One law firm submitted claims of nearly R500-million against the Eastern Cape health department
- The Special Investigating Unit described to Parliament last week how it is cracking down on dodgy medical legal claims.
- Payouts of medical related claims were R265-million in 2013. This skyrocketed to R2.7-billion in 2023.
- The SIU says it has uncovered evidence of law firms making fraudulent claims and it has stopped about R3-billion of such claims.
- It described one law firm in the Eastern Cape as doing “cut-and-paste” litigation.
Payments of medical related legal claims (medico-legal) against the Department of Health ballooned to R2.7-billion in 2023. In 2013, it was R265-million. This is according to the Special Investigating Unit (SIU) when it briefed the Standing Committee on Public Accounts (SCOPA) last week.
SIU head advocate Andy Mothibi told SCOPA it found evidence of collusion between attorneys, touts, nurses and doctors, in both public and private healthcare. Some law firms also withdrew claims when the SIU started investigating them. This had stopped about R3-billion in fraudulent claims, he said.
Claims under investigation included those targeting families with children born with cerebral palsy, false claims of medical malpractice in state hospitals, and collusion between state healthcare workers and rogue lawyers to unlawfully secure private medical records to initiate claims against the government.
They uncovered cases of agents of rogue law firms impersonating officials of the South African Social Security Agency to secure powers of attorney on behalf of victims by claiming to be securing them social grants. He said they found two attorneys pursuing identical claims for the same individual in two different courts, and for vastly different amounts, in one case for R7.5-million and R25-million for the same patient and same condition
Mothibi said the health sector experienced an explosion of medical practice litigation cases in 2015, directed against health institutions and individual medical practitioners in both public and private practice.
Mothibi said in one case a claimant demanded R70-million for a supposedly botched circumcision at a Limpopo hospital when no circumcision had been performed.
In 2017, the SIU started targeting provinces with the highest share of claims. At that stage, the Eastern Cape’s contingent liability for medico-legal claims was R15.9-billion; in Gauteng, it was R21.2-billion.
In the Eastern Cape, most medico-legal claims emanated from one Johannesburg-based law firm, Nonxuba Attorneys Incorporated. In five years, from 2012 to 2017, the firm submitted 44 claims totaling R497-million against the provincial health department. Nine claims for children born with cerebral palsy were identical each demanding R15-million.
“This was suspicious and indicated a lot of cut-and-paste on the part of this legal firm,” said Mothibi.
The company has, according to Mothibi’s presentation, been charged.
We have been unable to get hold of Nonxuba Attorneys and Business Day has previously reported that the company’s owner, Zuko Nonxuba, has been suspended from legal practice.
Also, in the Mthatha High Court claims increased from 46 to 529 between 2010 and 2016. There was collusion, said Mothibi, between some officials in the Office of the State Attorney, whereby out-of-court settlements for hefty sums were entered into without the mandate or even the knowledge of the department.
MP Veronica Mente-Nkuna (EFF) wanted to know the names of the legal firms implicated besides Nonxuba Attorneys and what the legal bodies have done about their operating licenses.
She asked why the Department of Health had not conducted its investigations before the claims were paid. Who was responsible for the loss of money through these fraudulent claims, she asked.
Next: Factory forced to relocate from Free State to Gauteng because of electricity outages
Previous: Loadshedding is not over in Cape Town’s deep south
© 2024 GroundUp. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You may republish this article, so long as you credit the authors and GroundUp, and do not change the text. Please include a link back to the original article.
We put an invisible pixel in the article so that we can count traffic to republishers. All analytics tools are solely on our servers. We do not give our logs to any third party. Logs are deleted after two weeks. We do not use any IP address identifying information except to count regional traffic. We are solely interested in counting hits, not tracking users. If you republish, please do not delete the invisible pixel.